Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by nex3 6287 days ago | link | parent

Yeah, I wasn't really sure about this. It seemed to be the path of least resistance, but if you want to write make-directory, which-os, and so forth (or their more primitive components) in Scheme and get rid of $, go for it.


5 points by nex3 6287 days ago | link

Okay, I've gone ahead and done this. Stable no longer references $ at all.

-----

2 points by CatDancer 6287 days ago | link

Well, I take that back. I'm not sure yet what I do want to do, but applying patches over other people's patches isn't it.

-----

2 points by eds 6287 days ago | link

There is still seval, right? You could use seval rather than $ in the stable branch, since it won't have to be updated except for arcn releases and bug fixes, so maintenance won't be too much of a problem. And it doesn't require writing entirely new library functions to implement.

-----

3 points by nex3 6287 days ago | link

I'm not sure why this would be any better than using $. I'd rather just add library functions and be done with it.

-----

0 points by CatDancer 6287 days ago | link

ok

-----