Ah, well, I skimmed it yesterday. Which I guess skimming is the last thing to do when it comes to a document of that sort ^.^
Essentially, I want to learn Lisp because the colloquial "they" recommend it to gain a better understanding of programming in general.
I want to learn Arc because it seems to take the lisp philosophy to heart the most out of the lisps.
And generally, I'm the type of person that can withstand some amount of "jumping into the deep end." Although, I may be in a bit too deep this time. Heh.
I'll probably continue to lurk around here until I've got a bit more experience under my belt, and thoughts to contribute.
Though I think a real stack exchange community is in order.
As to your question, I'm not qualified to answer, but it depends on your goals. What are your goals?
EDIT: Probably not though. Arc is intended to be "powerful"[1] not "educational" and Arc doesn't behave the way scheme does in(I believe) a lot of cases, e.g.: https://github.com/arclanguage/anarki/issues/48
I'm not sure how many people here follow the github account, so if you have questions just post them here. Don't worry about creating too many posts or comments, it's not like there's a lot of contention here :) Just do what works best for your learning, and we'll let you know if we want you to scale back.
If you see something broken or have suggestions to improve the documentation, post them on Github.
Yeah I figured that would be the deal getting into it, but I'm still willing to learn it. I think the whole philosophy is really neat.
I think what I'm going to try to do is continue to play around with Arc, while also learning on something a bit more established. Maybe Scheme or Clojure.
Right. I created one in Ruby not too long ago. Then I decided I wanted to see it in the browser, so I used something called Opal to convert my Ruby code to JS. Then I built up the necessary html/css.
Hmmm, that's interesting but I don't think it's what I'm running into. I get it on a first visit. I don't think my housemates are visiting the arc-forum at all . . .
If the Arc Forum adds a link to anything, I hope it adds a link to the community-maintained Arc website (https://arclanguage.github.io/). We can add links to other resources from there.
Yeah, there were several such stories during what I think of as Lisp's angsty mid-life crisis during and after the AI winter :) A couple more good ones:
"Programs written by individual hackers tend to follow the scratch-an-itch model. These programs will solve the problem that the hacker, himself, is having without necessarily handling related parts of the problem which would make the program more useful to others. Furthermore, the program is sure to work on that lone hacker's own setup, but may not be portable to other Scheme implementations or to the same Scheme implementation on other platforms. Documentation may be lacking. Being essentially a project done in the hacker's copious free time, the program is liable to suffer should real-life responsibilities intrude on the hacker. As Olin Shivers noted, this means that these one-man-band projects tend to solve eighty-percent of the problem."